Internal knowledge search
Assess an assistant using authorized documents, with source references, defined permissions and a clear response when information is insufficient.
Artificial intelligence
AI for a specific task, with criteria to verify it.
Before introducing a model, we define which task needs support, what information it may use and who will review its responses. The assessment compares an AI pilot with simpler alternatives; not every process needs artificial intelligence.
Request an assessmentScope to define
Applications we can assess with you.
Document classification and extraction
Test the identification of categories and fields in sample documents, with validation and exception reviews before incorporating results into other systems.
Team assistance
Explore drafts, summaries or suggestions for bounded tasks. The responsible person reviews the content before sending it or performing an action.
From problem to operations
Clear decisions before each delivery.
- 01
Define the task and risk
Define users, permitted decisions, relevant errors and a reference for the current process. Compare whether rules or an integration would better address the need.
- 02
Prepare authorized data
Review quality, permissions and sensitive data; agree on which information may be used, who can access it and the provider’s terms before uploading documents.
- 03
Evaluate a bounded pilot
Use representative examples and difficult cases to review responses, sources, errors, time and consumption against agreed acceptance criteria.
- 04
Decide and supervise
Decide whether to continue, adjust or discard the pilot. If integrated, define human review, logs, monitoring and an alternative when the system fails.
Deliverables
What needs to be defined.
Scope, responsibilities and delivery terms are specified in the project proposal.
- Use case, limits and acceptance criteria
- Data, permissions and responsibilities map
- Pilot and documented evaluation using authorized examples
- Human review, monitoring and failure response guide
Illustrative scenario · not a client case
Find procedures without losing the source
The situation
A team searches scattered manuals and needs to locate the applicable procedure, check that it is current and distinguish which documents each person may access.
One possible approach
An assistant could be tested with an authorized set of manuals, document references and access controls. If the source is insufficient or contradictory, the query would go to a person; the response would not execute changes on its own.
Supported responses, correct references, permission compliance and referrals to a person could be reviewed using an agreed test set. These are not achieved results or a promise of accuracy or savings.
Explore related scenariosBefore getting started
Questions to define the project.
Can AI make mistakes even when it cites documents?
Yes. A response can be incorrect, incomplete or based on outdated information. The pilot must also verify its sources and failures; citing a document does not replace human review or guarantee accuracy.
Can we use internal documents or sensitive data?
Only after agreeing on authorization, purpose, permissions, minimization and processing and retention terms. Not every provider is assumed to be suitable. This page does not upload documents or connect your data to a model.
Does the pilot mean automating decisions or purchasing a product?
No. Scope, consumption and the decision to integrate are agreed separately. External actions and sensitive decisions require defined controls and responsible parties; the pilot may be discarded. This service is neither the internal CRM nor a demo of Lansana Sales Intelligence, which remains in development.
Let’s start with a task, not a model